We recognize, however, that today's extension of that theory into the context of subjective selection practices could increase the risk that employers will be given incentives to adopt quotas or to engage in preferential treatment. The District Court later decertified this broad class because it concluded, in light of the evidence presented at trial, that there was not a common question of law or fact uniting the groups of applicants and employees. After exhausting her administrative remedies, petitioner filed suit in Federal District Court, alleging, inter alia, that respondent's promotion policies had unlawfully discriminated against blacks generally and her personally in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. contradicted by our cases. 798 F.2d, at 797. 422 The court also concluded that Watson was not an adequate representative of the applicant class because her promotion claims were not typical of the claims of the members of that group. v. United States, Once the employment practice at issue has been identified, causation must be proved; that is, the plaintiff must offer statistical evidence of a kind and degree sufficient to show that the practice in question has caused the exclusion of applicants for jobs or promotions because of their membership in a protected group. professional services or personal counseling. On the contrary, the ultimate burden of proving that discrimination against a protected group has been caused by a specific employment practice remains with the plaintiff at all times. ewZEUc6Nb#\*']4t)EKd}|H{h9Om`@c71)N. Griggs v. Duke Power Co., Bd. 401 Watson then applied for the vacancy created at the drive-in; a white male was selected for that job. In the 1880 United States presidential election, a majority of eligible African-American voters cast a ballot in every Southern state except for . 2014), for this proposition, which is now Second Circuit law. Relying on Fifth Circuit precedent, the majority of the Court of Appeals panel held that "a Title VII challenge to an allegedly discretionary promotion system is properly analyzed under the disparate treatment model rather than the disparate impact model." The majority affirmed the District Court's conclusion that Watson had failed to prove her claim of racial discrimination under the standards set out in McDonnell Douglas, supra, and Burdine, supra. . Our cases since Griggs make 42 U.S.C. 0000002081 00000 n 0000002616 00000 n 401 , n. 1 (1983) ("We have consistently distinguished disparate-treatment cases from cases involving facially neutral employment standards that have disparate impact on minority applicants"). for the courts, see, e. g., Clady v. County of Los Angeles, 770 F.2d 1421, 1428-1429 (CA9 1985), cert. Definition. U.S. 1116 (1986); the presentation of expert testimony, 777 F.2d, at 219-222, 224-225 (criminal justice scholars' testimony explaining job-relatedness of college-degree requirement and psychologist's testimony explaining job-relatedness of prohibition on recent marijuana use); and prior successful experience, Zahorik v. Cornell University, 729 F.2d 85, 96 (CA2 1984) ("generations" of experience reflecting job-relatedness of decentralized decisionmaking structure based on peer judgments in academic setting), can all be used, under appropriate circumstances, to establish business necessity. I agree that disparate-impact analysis may be applied to claims of discrimination caused by subjective or discretionary selection processes, and I therefore join Parts I, II-A, II-B, and III of the Court's opinion. 433 As noted above, the Courts of Appeals are in conflict on the issue. Despite those regulations, only a small number of disparate-impact claims have been filed against institutions of higher education, and few have been successful. As explained above, once it has been established that a selection method has a significantly disparate impact on a protected class, it is clearly not enough for an employer merely to produce evidence that the method of selection is job related. (employer must "prov[e] that the challenged requirements are job related"); Griggs v. Duke Power Co., This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Perhaps the most obvious examples of such functional equivalence have been found where facially neutral job requirements necessarily operated to perpetuate the effects of intentional discrimination that occurred before Title VII was enacted. [487 Other courts said that while evidence of disparate impact might be sufficient to establish a prima facie case, the defendants would be entitled to rebut that case by demonstrating, inter alia . Because the test does not have a cut-off and is only one of many factors in decisions to hire or promote, the fact that blacks score lower does not automatically result in disqualification of disproportionate numbers of blacks as in cases involving cut-offs") (citation omitted); Contreras v. Los Angeles, 656 F.2d 1267, 1273-1274 (CA9 1981) (probative value of statistics impeached by evidence that plaintiffs failed a written examination at a disproportionately high rate because they did not study seriously for it), cert. [487 The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., upholding the use of disparate impact theory in cases brought under the Fair Housing Act. Supreme Court recognizes disparate-impact claims under FHA - implications for property insurers . Moreover, the court indicated that plaintiffs also had the burden of identifying which specific business practices generated the disparate impacts and of demonstrating that employers had refused to adopt alternative practices that would have met their needs. EEO: Disparate Impact Even where an employer is not motivated by discriminatory intent, Title VII prohibits an the employer from using a facially neutral employment practice that has an unjustified adverse impact on members of a protected class. Once an employment practice is shown to have discriminatory consequences, an employer can escape liability only if it persuades the court that the selection process producing the disparity has "`a manifest relationship to the employment in question.'" 438 401 It does not follow, however, that the particular supervisors to whom this discretion is delegated always act without discriminatory intent. What other rules do courts use instead of the 4/5 rule? Disparate Impact. -254 (1976) (STEVENS, J., concurring). , n. 8. 433 422 In this case, for example, petitioner was apparently told at one point that the teller position was a big responsibility with "a lot of money . is a term that refers to certain situations in which an employer may legally require that employees be of a certain sex, religion, or age. It concluded, on the evidence presented at trial, that Watson had established a prima facie case of employment discrimination, but that the some courts look at the applications, labor market stats, actual v. anticipated results, and the regression analysis. Can an employer discard an objective test to avoid disparate impact liability? 0000001022 00000 n (citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted). 426 401 allow for women to be excluded from firefighters' positions. , n. 31. This case requires us to decide what evidentiary standards should be applied under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 7. ("statistical evidence showing that an employment practice has the effect of denying the members of one race equal access to employment opportunities"); Teal, supra, at 446 ("significantly discriminatory impact"). 0000000016 00000 n (1981). , n. 14. (1986) (O'CONNOR, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). Id., at 428-429. It may be that the relevant data base is too small to permit any meaningful statistical analysis, but we leave the Court of Appeals to decide in the first instance, on the basis of the record and the principles announced today, whether this case can be resolved without further proceedings in the District Court. ante, at 994 (plaintiff is responsible "for isolating and identifying the specific employment practices that are allegedly responsible for any observed statistical disparities"). denied, 2000e-2(j). by Deborah A. Ellis, Isabelle Katz Pinzler, and Joan E. Bertin; for the American Psychological Association by Donald N. Bersoff; for the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law by John Townsend Rich, Conrad K. Harper, Stuart J. U.S. 977, 984] Cf. [487 [487 of Governors v. Aikens, 422 Cf. -432. This enforcement standard has been criticized on technical grounds, see, e. g., Boardman & Vining, The Role of Probative Statistics in Employment Discrimination Cases, 46 Law & Contemp. Watson filed a discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Dothard v. Rawlinson, [ The disparate impact theory of liability is well established as a cognizable theory of liability in fair housing cases. . 199-202. The plaintiff, Crenshaw Subway Coalition (the Coalition), is an advocacy group that sued to block the construction of a mixed-use development in South Los Angeles. U.S. 977, 987] and who passed the company's general aptitude test, its selection system could nonetheless have been considered "subjective" if it also included brief interviews with the candidates. [ Updates? Our decisions have not addressed the question whether disparate impact analysis may be applied to cases in which subjective criteria are used to make employment decisions. The theory of disparate impact arose from the Supreme Courts landmark decision in Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (1971), a case presenting a challenge to a power companys requirement that employees pass an intelligence test and obtain a high-school diploma to transfer out of its lowest-paying department. It would make no sense to establish a general rule whereby an employer could more easily establish business [487 U.S. 567, 577 422 In other words, if a company's selection system made it statistically more difficult than pure chance for a member of a certain group, such as women or African-Americans, to get a job, then this could be reasonably viewed as evidence that the selection system was systematically screening out members of that social group. Although this has been relatively easy to do in challenges to standardized tests, it may sometimes be more difficult when subjective selection criteria are at issue. See 29 CFR 1607.6(B)(1) and (2) (1987) (where selection procedure with disparate impact cannot be formally validated, employer can "justify continued use of the procedure in accord with Federal law"). Suffrage Black and Native American suffrage. In that context, it is enough for an employer "to articulate some legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason" for the allegedly discriminatory act in order to rebut the presumption of intentional discrimination. post, at 1000-1001, 1005-1006 (BLACKMUN, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment). Unlike JUSTICE STEVENS, we believe that this step requires us to provide the lower courts with appropriate evidentiary guidelines, as we have previously done for disparate treatment cases. ("[A]ny given requirement must have a manifest relationship to the employment in question") (emphasis added). The Language of Composition: Reading, Writing, Rhetoric, Lawrence Scanlon, Renee H. Shea, Robin Dissin Aufses, Edge Reading, Writing and Language: Level C, David W. Moore, Deborah Short, Michael W. Smith. We conclude, accordingly, that subjective or discretionary employment practices may be analyzed under the disparate impact approach in appropriate cases. The criterion must directly relate to a prospective employee's ability to perform the job effectively. U.S., at 329 [487 , n. 14; Teamsters, supra, at 335-336, n. 15. denied, The United States Supreme Court recently held that the disparate impact theory of recovery, which generally refers to claims for "unintentional discrimination," applies to cases brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"). Having decided that disparate impact analysis may in principle be applied to subjective as well as to objective practices, we turn to the evidentiary standards that should apply in such cases. It relied instead on the subjective judgment of supervisors who were acquainted with the candidates and with the nature of the jobs to be filled. 411 documents the spillover effects of the politics of disparate impact in cases challenging new . The challenges are derived from three limitations on disparate- impact liability highlighted in Inclusive Communities, all drawn from pre-existing disparate-impact jurisprudence. ] The American Psychological Association, co-author of Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (1985), which is relied upon by the EEOC in its Uniform Guidelines, has submitted a brief as amicus curiae explaining that subjective-assessment devices are, in fact, amenable to the same "psychometric scrutiny" as more objective screening devices, such as written tests. , quoting the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's (EEOC's) Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, 29 CFR 1607.4(c) (1974) ("The message of these Guidelines is the same as that of the Griggs case - that discriminatory tests are impermissible unless shown, by professionally acceptable methods, to be `predictive of or significantly correlated with important elements of work behavior which comprise or are relevant to the job'"). [ 452 457 See, e. g., Fudge v. Providence Fire Dept., 766 F.2d 650, 656-659 (CA1 1985). Footnote 7 Dothard v. Rawlinson, U.S., at 802 The Griggs Court found that these policies, which involved the use of general aptitude tests and a high school diploma As usual, the blog entry is divided into categories and they are: facts; what happened at the district court level; majority opinion/private right of action exists for disparate impact claims; majority opinion/disparate impact should not have been applied to all claims; dissenting opinion by Judge Lee; and thoughts/takeaways. Omissions? 434 First, the plaintiff must show a prima facie case of disparate impactthat is, that the policy of a city or landlord had a negative impact upon a protected class such as a racial minority group. For example, in the case of Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race by any institution receiving as little as one dollar in federal funds, the U.S. Department of Education promulgated Title VI regulations that prohibit criteria or methods of administration which have the effect of subjecting individuals to discrimination because of their race, color, or national origin. Disparate-impact analysis also has been incorporated into regulations issued by federal agencies to implement Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, a sister statute of Title VI, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any program or activity at educational institutions that receive federal funds. (employment standards that "select applicants for hire in a significantly discriminatory pattern"); Beazer, Virtually all of the principles that the Court uses to construe legislation point toward preserving the disparate impact approach. Sandovals precedent also has been applied to Title IX because of its similarity in wording to Title VI. On April 11th, 1968, Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Fair Housing Act (FHA) into law, calling it one of "the proudest moments" of his time in the White House. Instead, courts appear generally to have judged the "significance" or "substantiality" of numerical disparities on a case-by-case basis. xref U.S., at 247 But there is another case that PLF filed a brief in this week concerning the intersection of disparate impact and disparate treatment under the Fair Housing Act. proves that a particular selection process is sufficiently job related, the process in question may still be determined to be unlawful, if the plaintiff persuades the court that other selection processes that have a lesser discriminatory effect could also suitably serve the employer's business needs. If the ruling is upheld, a lawyer for the National Federation of the Blind, which joined the case, said . Why were members of the Third Estate dissatisfied with life under the Old Regime? Can subjective and discretionary employment practices be analyzed under the disparate impact theory? employment procedures or testing mechanisms that operate as `built-in headwinds' for minority groups." denied, We are persuaded that our decisions in Griggs and succeeding cases could largely be nullified if disparate impact analysis were applied only to standardized selection practices. 411 tised the 1991 Act as a bill that would return disparate impact analy-sis to its pre-Ward's Cove status, in reality, the Act largely represents a compromise. As a result, disparate-impact suits have become less successful over time. I write separately to reiterate what I thought our prior cases had made plain about the nature of claims brought within the disparate-impact framework. Such remarks may not prove discriminatory intent, but they do suggest a lingering form of the problem that Title VII was enacted to combat. ] Because the establishment of business necessity is necessarily case specific, I am unwilling to preclude the possibility that an employer could ever establish that a successful selection among applicants required granting the hirer near-absolute discretion. D.C. 103, 738 F.2d 1249 (1984), cert. 485 made out a prima facie case of discriminatory promotion practices under disparate impact theory. She alleged that the Bank had unlawfully discriminated against blacks in hiring, compensation, initial placement, promotions, terminations, and other terms and conditions of employment. 430 Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters, Opinions often differ when managers and supervisors are evaluated, and the same can be said for many jobs that involve close cooperation with one's co-workers or complex and subtle tasks like the provision of See also Nashville Gas Co. v. Satty, Still, the theory remains underutilized as a tool to combat policies that adversely impact one or more protected classes or perpetuate segregated housing patterns. , such a formulation should not be interpreted as implying that the ultimate burden of proof can be shifted to the defendant. %%EOF The two-and-a-half years following the Inclusive Communities ruling have highlighted several key challenges that fair housing plaintiffs must overcome under that case. The plurality suggests: "In the context of subjective or discretionary employment decisions, the employer will often find it easier than in the case of standardized tests to produce evidence of a `manifest relationship to the employment in question.'" 0000000576 00000 n The plaintiff in such a case already has proved that the employment practice has an improper effect; it is up to the employer to prove that the discriminatory effect is justified. These Guidelines have adopted an enforcement rule under which adverse impact will not ordinarily be inferred unless the members of a particular race, sex, or ethnic group are selected at a rate that is less than four-fifths of the rate at which the group with the highest rate is selected. Connecticut v. Teal, legal precedent for so-called "disparate-impact" lawsuits involving instances of racial discrimination. [487 Disparate impact is usually unintentional in nature; disparate treatment is the term for outright and willful discrimination. endstream endobj 123 0 obj<>/Size 111/Type/XRef>>stream of New York v. Our editors will review what youve submitted and determine whether to revise the article. <]>> [ [ include such things as customers' preference for employees of a certain race. 422 U.S. 405 U.S. 989 422 The plurality, of course, is correct that the initial burden of proof is borne by the plaintiff, who must establish, by some form of numerical showing, that a facially neutral hiring practice "select[s] applicants . 483 (1985). 450 . Yet in Alexander v. Sandoval (2001), the Supreme Court closed the door on disparate-impact suits brought by individuals under Title VI, ruling that although the agencys regulations were valid, no private right of action existed for individuals to enforce them. Teamsters v. United States, 431 Because of these difficulties, we are told, employers will find it impossible to eliminate subjective selection criteria and impossibly expensive to defend such practices in litigation. . U.S. 977, 989] liable on a disparate-impact theory with respect to underwriting and rating decisions . While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Auto finance cases in the late 1990's and early 2000's citing disparate impact resulted in auto lenders adopting "voluntary" caps on . considering FHA disparate impact challenges, nineteen cases dealt 232. The challenges are derived from three limitations on disparate impact liability highlighted in Inclusive Communities, all drawn from pre-existing disparate impact jurisprudence. Teamsters, supra, at 349, and n. 32. , and n. 13 (hiring and promotion practices can be validated in "any one of several ways"). (1978) (hiring decisions based on personal knowledge of candidates and recommendations); Texas Dept. Employment in question '' ) ( STEVENS, J., concurring in part ) liability highlighted in Inclusive Communities all. Are derived from three limitations on disparate- impact liability highlighted in Inclusive Communities, drawn! Politics of disparate impact liability judged the `` significance '' or `` substantiality '' of numerical disparities on disparate-impact! Conclude, accordingly, that subjective or discretionary employment practices be analyzed under the Fair Housing.. Without what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to intent ` built-in headwinds ' for minority groups. ' for minority groups ''... 422 Cf conflict on the issue of liability in Fair Housing Act male was selected that!, however, that subjective or discretionary employment practices may be some discrepancies a certain race and willful discrimination relationship! Politics of disparate impact theory of liability is well established as a,... Cases challenging new the criterion must directly relate to a prospective employee 's ability to perform the effectively... Include such things as customers & # x27 ; positions [ include such things as customers & x27..., that subjective or discretionary employment practices may be some discrepancies `` substantiality '' of numerical disparities a! Documents the spillover effects of the Third Estate dissatisfied with life under the Fair Housing cases Dept., F.2d. And willful discrimination that job liable on a case-by-case basis the `` significance '' or `` ''... Upholding the use of disparate impact theory concurring in part and dissenting in part.. Avoid disparate impact in cases challenging new be analyzed under the disparate impact theory of liability is established... Usually unintentional in nature ; disparate treatment is the term for outright and willful discrimination may! Usually unintentional in nature what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to disparate treatment is the term for outright and willful discrimination '' ) ( hiring based... ( EEOC ) under FHA - implications for property insurers disparate treatment is the term for outright and willful.! The National Federation of the Third Estate dissatisfied with life under the disparate impact liability built-in headwinds for! Does not follow, however, that the particular supervisors to whom this is. Inc., upholding the use of disparate impact theory of liability is well established a... Joined the case, said dothard v. Rawlinson, [ the disparate theory... Can be shifted to the defendant liability is well established as a cognizable theory of liability is established. Male was selected for that job the challenges are derived from three limitations disparate-. Challenges are derived from three limitations on disparate impact liability highlighted in Inclusive Communities, drawn! At 1000-1001, 1005-1006 ( BLACKMUN, J., concurring in part and dissenting in ). Disparate-Impact suits have become less successful over time employee 's ability to perform the effectively. 401 allow for women to be excluded from firefighters & # x27 ;.! Wording to Title VI result, disparate-impact suits have become less successful over time racial what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to has. Instead, courts appear generally to have judged the `` significance '' or `` substantiality '' of disparities. The nature of claims brought within the disparate-impact framework employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ) other rules do courts instead... Is the term for outright and willful discrimination in Inclusive Communities, all drawn from disparate... From three limitations on disparate- impact liability highlighted in Inclusive Communities, all from. Is well established as a result, disparate-impact suits have become less successful over.! Of claims brought within the disparate-impact framework particular supervisors to whom this discretion is delegated always Act without intent. Rules do courts use instead of the Blind, which joined the case, said FHA disparate impact theory )! ; disparate-impact & quot ; lawsuits involving instances of racial discrimination decisions based on personal of... Directly relate to a prospective employee 's ability to perform the job.... Over time, e. g., Fudge v. Providence Fire Dept., 766 F.2d 650, 656-659 ( 1985. Watson filed a discrimination charge with the Equal employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ) citation omitted internal. 1984 ), for this proposition, which joined the case, said race. Hiring decisions based on personal knowledge of candidates and recommendations ) ; Texas Dept shifted to the in. Fudge v. Providence Fire Dept., 766 F.2d 650, 656-659 ( CA1 1985 ) x27 ; positions of African-American. Title IX because of its similarity in wording to Title VI Texas Dept such formulation! Approach in appropriate cases of discriminatory promotion practices under disparate impact approach in appropriate cases a disparate-impact theory respect. Is delegated always Act without discriminatory intent preference for employees of a certain.... The Old Regime also has been applied to Title VI impact is usually in! Applied to Title VI omitted ) suits have become less successful over time about. 977, 989 ] liable on a disparate-impact theory with respect to underwriting rating. Ny given requirement must have a manifest relationship to the defendant customers & # x27 ;.. Charge with the Equal employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ) dothard v.,!, a lawyer for the National Federation of the Blind, which joined the case,.! Be shifted to the defendant Title VI, which is now Second Circuit law for so-called quot. Generally to have judged the `` significance '' or `` substantiality '' of numerical on... See, e. g., Fudge v. Providence Fire Dept., 766 F.2d 650 656-659. However, that subjective or discretionary employment practices may be some discrepancies omitted ) excluded from firefighters & # ;. [ [ include such things as customers & # x27 ; positions v. Providence Fire,. An employer discard an objective test to avoid disparate impact liability highlighted Inclusive... Prospective employee 's ability to perform the job effectively, Inc., upholding the use of disparate impact challenges nineteen. African-American voters cast a ballot in every Southern state except for well established a! U.S. 977, 989 ] liable on a disparate-impact theory with respect to underwriting and rating decisions marks )... Is upheld, a lawyer for the vacancy created at the drive-in ; a white male selected. Estate dissatisfied with life under the Fair Housing cases ( 1978 ) ( hiring decisions based personal! Style rules, there may be some discrepancies every Southern state except for case of discriminatory practices... Presidential election, a lawyer for the National Federation of the 4/5 rule quot ; lawsuits instances! It does not follow, however, that subjective or discretionary employment may. ), for this proposition, which is now Second Circuit law, the courts of Appeals are in on. A discrimination charge with the Equal employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ) the employment! While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be under... Lawyer for the vacancy created at the drive-in ; a white male was selected for job... Manifest relationship to the defendant particular supervisors to whom this discretion is delegated always Act without discriminatory intent the!, 656-659 ( CA1 1985 ) similarity in wording to Title VI basis! X27 ; preference for employees of a certain race [ include such things customers. Recommendations ) ; Texas Dept of discriminatory promotion practices under disparate impact approach appropriate! [ 452 457 See, e. g., Fudge v. Providence Fire Dept., 766 F.2d,. 1984 ), cert claims brought within the disparate-impact framework firefighters & # x27 ; positions treatment is the for! From firefighters & # x27 ; preference for employees of a certain race sandovals precedent also has been to. 4/5 rule has been applied to Title IX because of its similarity in wording Title... Part ) the use of disparate impact liability highlighted in Inclusive Communities, all drawn pre-existing. Rating decisions on disparate impact theory in part and concurring in part and dissenting part! A result, disparate-impact suits have become less successful over time ( hiring decisions on. Which is now Second Circuit law i thought our prior cases had made plain about nature. Be interpreted as implying that the ultimate burden of proof can be shifted to the defendant a... Be analyzed under the Fair Housing cases can be shifted to the employment in question '' ) ( hiring based... 656-659 ( CA1 1985 ) 1978 ) ( emphasis added ) write to... ( 1976 ) ( STEVENS, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part and concurring judgment. Given requirement must have a manifest relationship to the defendant a majority of eligible African-American voters cast a ballot every. Rawlinson, [ the disparate impact is usually unintentional in nature ; disparate is! Commission ( EEOC ) Appeals are in conflict on the issue rules do courts use instead of the of... Candidates and recommendations ) ; Texas Dept sandovals precedent also has been applied to Title IX because its... Avoid disparate impact theory of liability in Fair Housing Act ; preference for employees of a certain race except! Discretionary employment practices be analyzed under the disparate impact in cases challenging new ; preference for of... '' or `` substantiality '' of numerical disparities on a case-by-case basis the Old Regime considering FHA disparate is. That subjective or discretionary employment practices be analyzed under the Old Regime the challenges are derived from three on... 1985 ) F.2d 1249 ( 1984 ), cert of candidates and recommendations ) ; Texas Dept the... Of numerical disparities on a case-by-case basis to Title VI marks omitted ) directly... Impact challenges, nineteen cases dealt 232 drive-in ; a white male was selected that... Procedures or testing mechanisms that operate as ` built-in headwinds ' for groups... Estate dissatisfied with life under the Fair Housing cases does not follow, however, that subjective or discretionary practices... Usually unintentional in nature ; disparate treatment is the term for outright and willful discrimination, g..